<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="0.91">
  <channel>
  <title>Magna Legal Services Online Newsletter</title>
  <link>http://www.magnals.com/newsletter/</link>
  <description>Magna Legal Services Online Newsletter: Latest Articles</description>
  <language>en-US</language>
    <item id="24614">
      <author>Ron Kurzman, Litigation Consultant / Partner</author>
      <title>Ask a Jury Consultant</title>
      <description><![CDATA[
	<b>Q:</b> I am picking a jury next week and the success of my case clearly depends on me de-selecting jurors that have biases against corporations. I am very confident with my voir dire questions which are designed to ferret-out anti-corporate jurors (which is almost everyone, post-financial-collapse). However, some jurors just do not tell the whole truth in voir dire. It is crucial that I remove any jurors with corporate bias, so how do I know if a juror is lying?<br><br><b>A:</b> Great question! On my list of dangerous things to avoid, "stealth-jurors" are in a close second place behind nuclear bombs. Stealth-jurors are those jurors that are motivated to be on the jury. I also refer to them as juror-saboteurs! As you indicated, you can win or lose your case in jury selection. No matter how well devised your jury selection strategy is – it is only as good as an honest juror. Oh and guess what, jurors lie! Most of the time they lie to get off of a jury, but at times they lie to get on one.	<a href="http://www.magnals.com/newsletter/articles/2009/01/qa.html">read more</a>
      ]]></description>
      <link>http://www.magnals.com/newsletter/articles/2009/01/qa.html</link>
      <time>2009-01-12</time>
      <pubDate>Jan  12, 2009</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item id="24613">
      <author>Peter Hecht, VP of Sales and Business Development</author>
      <title>The Basics of Business Development</title>
      <description><![CDATA[
	<img src="http://www.magnals.com/newsletter/images/article_selling.gif" align="right" />We all know how difficult it is to land that first lunch or dinner appointment with a new prospect. We spend endless hours staring at our computer screen coming up with that perfect email invitation or even better, pondering going old school via the phone? So when we get the all important "yes" it's paramount that we follow a few simple rules to ensure that we don't mess up the start of a new relationship.<br><br>I have three basic rules that I try to honor at breakfast, lunch or dinner. They are simple and easy to remember.<br><br>
	<ol>
	<li>Leave the power seat open.</li>
	<li>No phones or Blackberrys.</li>
	<li>Let your guest order first.</li>
   	</ol>
   	<a href="http://www.magnals.com/newsletter/articles/2009/01/basics_bizdev.html">read more</a>
      ]]></description>
      <link>http://www.magnals.com/newsletter/articles/2009/01/basics_bizdev.html</link>
      <time>2009-01-12</time>
      <pubDate>Jan  12, 2009</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item id="24612">
      <author>Dylan Green and David Kurzman, Trial Presentation Consultants</author>
      <title>Straight Talk: Communication and Technology in the Court Room</title>
      <description><![CDATA[
	Case study # 12087: The court house was built in 1924 and updated in 2001. The courtroom's built-in technology was limited to a projection screen and a semi-functional microphone system. Pre-trial support consisted of imaging and branding 150 documents and assembling trial binders to streamline trial presentation. Sanction was used to present both depositions and documents in the courtroom. Presentation of deposition and trial testimony played a large role in the outcome as experts and fact witnesses on the plaintiff side were inconsistent on numerous occasions. <a href="http://www.magnals.com/newsletter/articles/2009/01/straight_talk.html">read more</a>
      ]]></description>
      <link>http://www.magnals.com/newsletter/articles/2009/01/straight_talk.html</link>
      <time>2009-01-12</time>
      <pubDate>Jan  12, 2009</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item id="24610">
      <author>Ron Kurzman, Litigation Consultant / Partner</author>
      <title>Helping Corporations Manage Risk</title>
      <description><![CDATA[
	Companies get sued; it is a part of doing business. Today, when corporate distrust reigns, companies are being sued at a greater rate and for more money than at any time in the past. It is no coincidence that this recent influx of corporate litigation coincides with a faltering market, which finds corporate executives scrambling to reduce costs and limit exposure. As a result of these difficult times, executives are relying on general counsel to act, more than ever, as Legal Risk Managers. <a href="http://www.magnals.com/newsletter/articles/2009/01/manage_risk.html">read more</a>
      ]]></description>
      <link>http://www.magnals.com/newsletter/articles/2009/01/manage_risk.html</link>
      <time>2009-01-12</time>
      <pubDate>Jan  12, 2009</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item id="24611">
      <author>Maria Hutnick, CLR </author>
      <title>Technology and the Modern Deposition</title>
      <description><![CDATA[
	The world has evolved into a global market and the legal technology industry has created software to help litigation attorneys thrive within this fast paced and demanding arena. Experts, Senior Counsel and In-house Counsel can now remotely participate in live depositions without ever leaving their offices. Legal technology companies such as I-Dep and LiveNote provide web-based user interface that displays live streaming video of the deponent, real-time transcripts, and a chat system. The chat system allows the attorney at the deposition site to discreetly communicate with remote users. <a href="http://www.magnals.com/newsletter/articles/2009/01/modern_deposition.html">read more</a>
      ]]></description>
      <link>http://www.magnals.com/newsletter/articles/2009/01/modern_deposition.html</link>
      <time>2009-01-12</time>
      <pubDate>Jan  12, 2009</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item id="24609">
      <author>Nicole A. Matthiesen, Litigation Graphics Consultant</author>
      <title>Graphic of the Month: Evidence of Discrimination</title>
      <description><![CDATA[
	 <b>The Case:</b> We were contacted by a plaintiff’s firm who was suing a large company for sexual discrimination in the work place.<br><br><b>The Challenge:</b> To communicate to the jury in a graphic the disproportionate amount of men in management and executive roles compared to women in support roles. <a href="http://www.magnals.com/newsletter/articles/2009/01/graphic.html">read more</a>
      ]]></description>
      <link>http://www.magnals.com/newsletter/articles/2009/01/graphic.html</link>
      <time>2009-01-12</time>
      <pubDate>Jan  12, 2009</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item id="24608">
      <author>Nicole A. Matthiesen, Litigation Graphics Consultant</author>
      <title>Presentation of the Month: Mold Exposure</title>
      <description><![CDATA[
	To create a compelling argument and fully illustrate your ideas, words are often not enough. That is why Magna employs the best graphic consultants in the industry. We will design and create effective visuals to help you tell your story in a way that is persuasive and easily understood by your audience. Our graphics team works closely with our clients to develop graphic-supported solutions and customized demonstratives.<br><br>This months presentation, from Caldwell vs NOLA Builders Association, involves mold exposure within the home and how it relates to human health. <a href="http://www.magnals.com/newsletter/articles/2009/01/presentation.html">read more</a>
      ]]></description>
      <link>http://www.magnals.com/newsletter/articles/2009/01/presentation.html</link>
      <time>2009-01-12</time>
      <pubDate>Jan  12, 2009</pubDate>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>